首页> 外文OA文献 >Outcomes of chest compression only CPR versus conventional CPR conducted by lay people in patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest witnessed by bystanders: nationwide population based observational study
【2h】

Outcomes of chest compression only CPR versus conventional CPR conducted by lay people in patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest witnessed by bystanders: nationwide population based observational study

机译:胸外按压CpR与常规CpR治疗的结果相比,旁观者见证了旁观者:在全国范围内进行观察性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with chest compression only and conventional CPR on outcomes after cardiopulmonary arrest out of hospital.DESIGN: Nationwide population based observational study.SETTING: A nationwide emergency medical service system in Japan. Population All consecutive patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, January 2005 to December 2007 in Japan, witnessed at the moment of collapse. Lay people attempted chest compression only CPR (n = 20,707) or conventional CPR (mouth to mouth ventilation and chest compression) (n = 19,328), and patients were transferred to hospital by ambulance.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with better outcomes (assessed with χ(2), multiple logistic regression analysis, odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals): one month survival and neurologically favourable one month survival rates defined as category one (good cerebral performance) or two (moderate cerebral disability) of the cerebral performance categories.RESULTS: Conventional CPR was associated with better outcomes than chest compression only CPR, for both one month survival (adjusted odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.29) and neurologically favourable one month survival (1.17, 1.01 to 1.35). Neurologically favourable one month survival decreased with increasing age and with delays of up to 10 minutes in starting CPR for both conventional and chest compression only CPR. The benefit of conventional CPR over chest compression only CPR was significantly greater in younger people in non-cardiac cases (P = 0.025) and with a delay in start of CPR after the event was witnessed in non-cardiac cases (P = 0.015) and all cases combined (P = 0.037).CONCLUSIONS: Conventional CPR is associated with better outcomes than chest compression only CPR for selected patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, such as those with arrests of non-cardiac origin and younger people, and people in whom there was delay in the start of CPR.
机译:目的:比较心肺复苏(CPR)与仅胸外按压和常规心肺复苏(CPR)对心肺停止住院后结局的效果。设计:全国人群的观察性研究。环境:日本的全国紧急医疗服务系统。人口2005年1月至2007年12月在日本,所有连续的院外心肺骤停患者均在崩溃时目睹。外行人仅尝试胸部按压CPR(n = 20,707)或常规CPR(口对口通气和胸部按压)(n = 19,328),并通过救护车将患者转入医院。主要观察指标:与预后较好相关的因素(评估)与χ(2),多元logistic回归分析,比值比及其95%置信区间):1个月生存率和神经学上令人满意的1个月生存率被定义为大脑的第一类(良好的大脑表现)或第二类(中度大脑残疾)结果:对于仅一个月的存活率(调整比值比1.17,95%置信区间1.06至1.29)和神经学上有利的一个月存活率(1.17,1.01至1.35),常规心肺复苏比仅胸部按压CPR具有更好的结局。 。对于常规和仅胸部按压的心肺复苏术,神经学上有利的一个月生存率随着年龄的增长和开始心肺复苏术的延误长达10分钟而降低。在非心脏病例中,传统心肺复苏比仅胸外按压的益处在年轻人中显着更大(P = 0.025),在非心脏病例中观察到事件发生后,CPR开始延迟(P = 0.015),并且结论:对于某些院外心肺骤停的患者,例如非心脏骤停的患者和年轻人,以及那些患有非心脏起搏的患者,常规心肺复苏术比仅胸部按压的心肺复苏术具有更好的结局。心肺复苏术开始有延迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号